Padilla v. USPS, EEOC Appeal No. Claim regarding the denial of official time remanded to Agency for investigation; although Agency did not need to investigate whether the denial was discriminatory, it should have determined whether the denial was justified. 2019003663 (Aug. 22, 2019), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/2019003663.pdf. Agency's liability for compensatory damages extended back to the beginning of the sexual harassment, not the date that management became aware of it and failed to take prompt remedial action. 0120122795 (Feb. 23, 2016), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120122795.txt. 0120180570, 0120181692, and 2019002121 (Sept. 4, 2019), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120180570.pdf. The government-wide average was 344 days. Sonia B. v. Tennessee Valley Authority, EEOC Appeal No. A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States. For Deaf/Hard of Hearing callers:
All workers here quit, retired, or were fired. Letter of Caution's reference to an EEO settlement and Complainant's claim of discrimination constituted per se reprisal; references to Complainant's EEO activity in a disciplinary context could reasonably have a chilling effect on the use of the EEO complaint process. 2019000778 (Nov. 27, 2019), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/2019000778.pdf. Iliana S. v. U.S. She further alleged the USPS retaliated against her for prior EEO action from 2005-2006. Allegations of retaliation by IRS Examiner and Taxpayer Advocate properly dismissed for failure to state a claim where actions at issue occurred to Complainant as a taxpayer, not as a former employee, and allegations constituted a collateral attack on the tax adjudication process. Published Sept. 27, 2021 Updated Oct. 28, 2021. Antony Z. v. Dep't of the Army, EEOC Request No. The claims, evidence, and legal briefs for all of our clients' relief claims have been submitted to the EEOC Administrative Judge. The Judge has not yet made clear exactly how she plans to move forward with reviewing the information or issuing relief decisions. Zonia C. v. Dep't of Justice, EEOC Appeal No. hbbd```b``"WI~ Margaret M. v. Dep't of Veterans Affairs, EEOC Appeal No. 0120150213 (Feb. 16, 2017), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120150213.txt. Summary judgment in favor of Agency appropriate where there were no genuine issues of material fact or credibility that merited a hearing; record showed that Agency issued Complainant a Letter of Counseling because of allegations that he had used improper language of a vulgar or sexual nature and that Agency discharged him during his probationary period due to his repeated discourteous behavior; Complainant provided no evidence that raised a genuine issue of material fact that any of his protected bases played a role in the Agency's actions. According to the nonprofit organization ProPublica the EEOC ruled that the NRP illegally discriminated against injured workers by creating a hostile work environment, taking away disability accommodations and revealing workers confidential medical information in 2015 and 2017. 0120182505 (Nov. 7, 2018), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120182505.pdf. 2019001284 (Aug. 4, 2020), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/decisions/2020_12_07/2019001284.pdf. v. Megan J. Brennan, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, EEOC . Complainant not entitled to award of Thrift Savings Plan reimbursements where there was no evidence that she participated in the program. The Agency discriminated against Complainant based on his disability when it failed to provide him with a reasonable accommodation in a timely manner and when it delayed his promotion. Postal Service who have been subjected to the National Reassessment Process (NRP) from May 5, 2006 to present, allegedly in violation of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. Sherrill S. v. Dep't of the Air Force, EEOC Petition No. Last year, when the city of Minneapolis awarded $27 million to the family of George Floyd, their attorney called it the largest pretrial civil rights settlement ever. Copyright 2023 The Angel Law Firm, PLLC. Postmaster engaged in an impermissible disability-related inquiry when the Postmaster asked Complainant in front of a customer if she was dyslexic. USPS has joined more than 1,500 companies using The Work Number, an automated service that allows you to quickly and securely provide proof of your employment or income. The EEOC notes that this is the highest amount in 16 years. January 17, 2020 - Status Update - Pittman Settlement Letters. First, please know that we will continue fighting to get you the best possible award. Lara G. v. United States Postal Service https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0520130618.txt. Alesia P. v. Dep't of Justice, EEOC Appeal No. Cathy V. v. Dep't of Health and Human Services, EEOC Appeal No. In these districts, the Postal Inspection Service investigated 145 . Complainant subjected to a hostile work environment based on sex where subordinate disparaged him because of his sexual orientation and managers, who placed the onus on Complainant to discipline the harasser or file an EEO complaint, failed to take prompt and effective action; because Agency did not have an effective anti-harassment policy, Agency was ordered to seek technical assistance from EEOC's Office of Federal Operations and to correct the policy's deficiencies. An Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) administrative judge may suspend a hearing to allow the parties to settle a case and will accept a settlement to resolve the case at any time before a final decision is reached. A lock ( Before such hearing was held, plaintiff Case 1:03-cv-01987-EGS Document 25 Filed 09/28/05 Page 1 of 19 2019002760 (Aug. 18, 2020), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/decisions/2020_12_07/2019002760.pdf. Neither did the unions make any effort to unite USPS workers with their class brothers and sisters across the border during the 2018 strike of 50,000 Canadian postal workers, who were also fighting against a brutal profit-driven work regimen where real wages had fallen and understaffing led to speedup and heavy workloads that caused an accident rate among postal workers to be five times that of the average rate for federally regulated industries. The video game publisher Activision Blizzard said Monday that it would pay $18 million in a settlement with a federal employment agency that filed a . The majority of cases, about 67 percent, are ruled in the plaintiff's favor when taken to litigation. Substantial evidence supported Administrative Judge's determination that the Agency discriminated against Complainant on the basis of race when it terminated his employment as a sales store checker during his probationary period; the AJ found Complainant to be credible, the Agency's stated reason (that Complainant had an altercation with a bagger) was not believable, the evidence showed that those terminated during their probationary period were predominantly African-Americans, and a Caucasian employee who also had an altercation with the bagger did not receive any disciplinary action. USPS Settlement An EEOC Administrative Judge has approved a settlement in the Pittman v. USPS Class Complaint in which the complaint alleged discrimination based on disability against a class of employees in permanent rehabilitation positions, on a nation-wide basis. Patricia W. v. Dep't of Homeland Security, EEOC Appeal No. On September 1, 2022 Arbitrator Joseph M. Sharnoff issued his latest national-level RI-399 award, this one concerning the Automated Delivery Unit Sorter (ADUS). Complainant established a prima facie case of age discrimination, and Agency did not meet its burden of production to articulate a legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason for not selecting Complainant for a supervisory position; stating that a complainant was not selected because she received a lower score than the selectees does not meet an agencys burden of production, unless the agency explains the specific reasoning for the score. 2019004326 (Sept. 30, 2020), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/decisions/2020_12_07/2019004326.pdf. information only on official, secure websites. 536 0 obj
<>stream
Washington DC 20005. Cox filed another EEO complaint of discrimination which is still pending. XOs`4ueYh;Ex=B,Dv4 RhA8eKw/VAFGVg(Iz8u.V:\Ms|(pAGn%A@%xK b8@8\Kx78 Y> &L
P dv0H4t0p40Ht00
@` h*D#8&i
4 a`M@, Miguelina S. v. Dep't of Justice, EEOC Request No. She alleged the USPS had not complied with the EEOC order. Irina T. v. United States Postal Service, EEOC Appeal No. Annalee D. v. General Services Administration, EEOC Request No. Labor costs made up 80 percent of the USPS operating costs at the time that the NRP was rolled out. 131 M Street, NE
0120162182 (Dec. 8, 2017), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120162182.txt. Particularly useful are their publications "Questions and Answers About . endstream
endobj
startxref
on 8/11/2022 Joint Employers in Permian Basin Retaliated. As of September 30, 2009, USPS employed 5,372 (0.76%) Individuals with Targeted Disabilities (IWTD). Postal workers in the US and worldwide cannot allow their struggles to be trapped within the realm of the labor unions and capitalist parties any longer. 1614.302(b), when an individual appeals the agency's processing of a mixed-case complaint to the MSPB and the MSPB dismisses the appeal for lack of jurisdiction, the agency should issue a notice under 29 C.F.R. If it is found that you meet the legal criteria for reinstatement, the Judge can order USPS to give you back the job you held before the NRP. Will K. v. U.S. 2019001468 (June 5, 2019), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/2019001468.pdf. Complainant raised his reasonable-accommodation claim in a timely manner; the duty to provide reasonable accommodation is ongoing and, at the time that he contacted the EEO Counselor, Complaint was alleging that the Agency remained unwilling to provide him with reasonable accommodation. The Administrative Judge's denial of class certification was appropriate where the putative class agent failed to establish that the class met the commonality, typicality, and adequacy of representation requirements. 1300 L Street NW shooting in sahuarita arizona; traduction saturn sleeping at last; is bachendorff a good brand; Workers in the class action suit claim that this is false and that other workers had to speed up to cover their heavy workloads after they were fired. usps eeoc settlements 2020 usps eeoc settlements 2020. ps4 controller trigger keeps activating. An official website of the United States government. 0120171406 (Mar. The more inherently degrading or humiliating the defendants action is, the more reasonable to infer that a person would suffer humiliation or distress from that action. Within the Office of Workers' Compensation Programs (OWCP), the Division of Federal Employees' Compensation (DFEC) is responsible for processing claims filed by Postal Service employees. 2021001514 (June 28, 2021), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/decisions/2021_08_31/2021001514.pdf. The lies to protect themselves is mind boggling. 1-800-669-6820 (TTY)
Record was insufficient to determine whether Agency jointly employed Complainant where record did not contain the contract between the Agency and staffing firm, Complainant's position description, or any evidence regarding the day-to-day actions, duties, and responsibilities of Complainant's job. Upon your death, all of your assets will pass along, either under the terms of a will or (if you have no will) pursuant to what the law prescribes. Bertram K. v. Dep't of Justice, EEOC Appeal No. Joshua F. v. Dep't of Veterans Affairs, EEOC Appeal No. Frequently Asked Questions, Commissioner Charges and Directed Investigations, Office of Civil Rights, Diversity and Inclusion, Management Directives & Federal Sector Guidance, Federal Sector Alternative Dispute Resolution. ) or https:// means youve safely connected to the .gov website. 2 The present-day value of comparable cases is to be considered when determining an award of emotional distress damages. The program sought to significantly cut labor costs for USPS, which faced increasing operating costs from fuel price increases, decreasing revenue from reductions in the use of priority services like first-class mail, as well as increasing competition for the delivery of packages and urgent mail from giant logistics corporations like UPS and FedEx. Where there is an actionable third-party retaliation, both the employee who engaged in the protected activity and the third party who is subjected to the materially adverse action may state a claim. Mac O. v. United States Postal Service, EEOC Appeal No. v. United States Postal Service an AJ decision certified the following class: In our continuing commitment to require postal managements compliance with the August 2016 arbitration decision rendered by national arbitrator Shyam (This article first appeared in the January/February 2021 issue of the American Postal Worker magazine) Harriet M. v. Dep't of Defense, EEOC Appeal No. Your claim in this case is a personal asset. A class actioncomplaintfor injured on duty postal employees was certified by an EEOC Administrative Judge (AJ) on May 30,2008. 8403 Colesville RoadSuite 1000Silver Spring, MD 20910, 610 South Ninth StreetLas Vegas, NV 89101, 2023 Gilbert Employment Law, P.C. *Includes only complaints filed in FY 2009 where counseling was also completed during FY 2009. Update: McConnell vs USPS NRP EEOC Class Action Lawsuit Posted on December 14, 2020 by postal A class action complaint for injured on duty postal employees was certified by an EEOC Administrative Judge (AJ) on May 30,2008. 2020002203, 2020002190, 2020002216, 2020002197 (Jan. 28, 2021), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/decisions/2021_08_16/2020002203.pdf. In order to have met the federal 2% participation rate goal, 14,158 IWTD were needed. hb```,,K@( Substantial evidence supported the Administrative Judge's determination that the Agency retaliated against Complainant for protected EEO activity when it issued her a Letter of Counseling. Agency did not take prompt corrective action, and therefore did not meet its affirmative defense to harassment, when it took six months to engage in an internal investigation and issue a proposed 30-day suspension to the coworker who had sent Complainant a threatening email containing a racial slur. For our 2021 report, we analyzed USPS data from fiscal years 2016 through 2020 to determine turnover and injury rates. Jennifer K. v. Dep't of the Navy, EEOC Appeal No. LockA locked padlock That number includes both private sector and state and local . Terisa B. v. Dep't of Defense, EEOC Appeal Nos. 0720150002 (Sept. 25, 2017), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0720150002.txt. Postal Service, EEOC Appeal No. Although the Agency argued that there were "security reasons" for delaying the accommodation, it did not provide any details describing the concerns, it "lost track" of his request for approximately five months, and it failed to respond adequately to his request for a list of Agency-approved software. Irvin M. v. Dep't of Homeland Security, EEOC Appeal No. Agency discriminated against Complainant on the basis of disability when his managers did not allow him to take a polygraph examination, which was required for his position, where there was no reason to believe that his multiple sclerosis and medication would affect the validity of the polygraph result. The four unions which officially represent the postal workersthe American Postal Workers Union, National Association of Letter Carriers, National Postal Mail Handlers Union and National Rural Letter Carriers Associationhave not lifted a finger to mobilize workers to oppose these attacks, including the loss of over 250,000 post office jobs since 1999an almost 28 percent reduction in its workforce. 0120182764 (June 23, 2021), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/decisions/2021_08_31/0120182764.pdf. Agency liable for harassment and constructive discharge based on sexual orientation where, although Agency removed the harasser from the work schedule at the restaurant where she and Complainant worked pending an investigation, it allowed her to return as a customer--where she continued to harass and threaten Complainant with bodily harm--and it then returned her to the work schedule; under these circumstances, it was reasonable for Complainant to feel so threatened that he resigned.