That's not always true, but it's often true. A: Quantum mechanics is often quoted as the explanation for many things, because it's so weird that people latch onto it as a hope, to explain everything that they would like to believe about the universe. And we are certainly not isolated from the rest of the world. There are also controlled, double-blind prayer studies out there much more interesting than the D.C. crime study cited in the film, though not necessarily more convincing. And most thoughtful members of the "spiritual but not religious" camp would take issue if you chopped off their big toes and then responded to their complaints with a lofty "it's all in your mind." On the other hand, one finds 3+1, or more concretely inverse square law, to be mathematically peculiar when it refers to gravity, ie when mass is the source of the force. You can't change the world by thinking about it. But are there new, weird applications that people might see that have an impact on everyday life, beyond the woo-woo? Some ideas discussed in the film are: In the narrative segments of the film, Marlee Matlin portrays Amanda, a photographer who plays the role of everywoman as she experiences her life from startlingly new and different perspectives. [16], David Albert, a philosopher of physics who appears in the film, has accused the filmmakers of selectively editing his interview to make it appear that he endorses the film's thesis that quantum mechanics is linked with consciousness. 3) Lots of people still hunger for a magical universe, and now hope that science can deliver it, after Nietsche's announcement of God's death. They may applaud the central tenets of the movie, but not its disjointed narrative, clunky acting, bizarre thematic segues, and faux "facts." With Marlee Matlin, Elaine Hendrix, Barry Newman, Armin Shimerman. To date, Dr Emoto has not taken up the challenge. logged you out. Many religions and spiritual paths--from Hinduism, with its concept of maya, to Christian Science--teach that appearance is illusion. In a corrupt, greed-fueled world, a powerful alchemist leads a Christ-like character and seven materialistic figures to the Holy Mountain,. One other area where quantum mechanics works on a macroscopic scale is in superconductivity and superfluidity. The main thing to know is that "observation" is a bad word for the process which goes on which we have inherited from the days when quantum mechanics was first discovered, and is unfortunately a bit easier to teach in introductory courses than decoherence. so much for no good or bad, that is unless it is convienent. Can the weirdness of quantum mechanics make you well, or make you wealthy? So thanks to Associate Professor Zdenka Kuncik, Professor Peter Schofield and Professor Max Coltheart for shedding some light on the Bleeping thing. Hidden Messages In Water Hidden Messages in . It demands a freedom of view and greatness of thought so far unknown, indeed, not even dreamed of since Copernicus. A: Well, Roger Penrose has given lots of new-age crackpots ammunition by suggesting that at some fundamental scale, quantum mechanics might be relevant for consciousness. Cathleen Falsani, who must have been taking notes while I was staring gobsmacked at the screen, quotes the 35,year-old . In addition to the films three directors, there were actors and others involved in the production who are long time students of Ramthas School of enlightenment. We're always being told we don't use our brain to its full capacity. Right now they use a key that's based on the products of large prime numbers, and no computer could determine the prime factors in a time shorter than the age of the universe. What the Bleep Do We Know draws heavily on the role of the observer in quantum physics. That matter is not solid, and electrons are able to pop in and out of existence without it being known where they disappear to. About. Joe Dispenza The experts start "proving" that humans create their own reality by getting too attached to certain brain chemicals. We're also connected to the universe by gravity, and we're connected to the planets by gravity. Is that last line The fact that someone who spouts such utter nonsense can get a Ph.D. from Harvard and be one of the most widely cited authors on supersymmetric models is pretty remarkable some sort of strange attack on SUSY models? Quantum mechanics is a replacement for the phrase "anything goes." One possible answer: they go to an alternative universe where people are asking the same question: 'where'd they go?'" And it certainly doesn't depend on an observer to make this happen. A classic experiment on visual processing involves asking people to watch a video of 6 people passing a basketball, and press a button every time a particular team has possession. We're bombarded by many things every second of the day, and a result, we're not specially prepared quantum mechanical systems, nor can we exert weird quantum powers over other objects. As the Amanda plot zooms here and there, a host of dubious evidence is marshaled to convince us that life is all about mind over matter. Adapted from "Ask the Everyday Scientist" with permission of the writer. You can't just hope for the best. [2]. My FIL is a ex-Air force Pilot. It was really hard to sit through. He has however just released his third book of pretty crystal pictures. Our mind has enormous potential, but we only use a small part of it for conscious thought, and we miss a lot of what's going on around us. [5] Foreign gross added another $5 million for a worldwide gross of nearly $16 million. [5], According to the makers of the film, "Bleep" is an expurgation of "fuck". So on one hand you have a threat to security, and on the other you have a possible boon for security. last of a series of columns written for Scientific American, Why great minds can't grasp consciousness. One of the scientists interviewed is John Hagelin who, besides being part of the TM cult surrounding Maharishi Mahesh Yogi, presidential candidate of the Natural Law Party, and Minister of Science and Technology of the Global Country of World Peace is a rather prominent particle theorist. Whether or not you buy into its "you are God in the making" philosophy, "What the Bleep Do We Know?" Ive not seen the movie, and dont intend to, but David Alberts book on Quantum Mechanics and Experience is one of the best things Ive read on the interpretation of QM. Lawrence Krauss: I think it's probably one of the most abused concepts in physics among the public. In the movie What the Bleep Do We Know?, physicists, biologists and the occasional chiropractor tell us how quantum physics and neuroscience support their views on consciousness. Water beamed messages of love or gratitude formed itself into lovely snowflake-like crystals; water exposed to the words "You make me sick" looks like the surface of a toxic waste pond. (stylized as What t #$*! There was some sort of plot involving a woman photographer (played by Marlee Matlin), who wanders around and has anxiety attacks. Initially, the film was released in only two theaters: one in Yelm, Washington (the home of the producers, which is also the home of Ramtha), and the other the Bagdad Theater in Portland, Oregon, where it was filmed. Moreover, the movie proposes no plausible physical mechanism by which thoughts influence matter. Wertheim continues that the film "abandons itself entirely to the ecstasies of quantum mysticism, finding in this aleatory description of nature the key to spiritual transformation. Well, people are able to undergo various transformations. On certain scales, for certain times, in certain regions, everything goes and strange things happen. Even followers of spiritual traditions that believe in worldly illusion will have problems with "Bleep." [11], Scientists who have reviewed What the Bleep Do We Know!? Dr. Jeffrey Satinover (psychiatrist, PhD candidate in physics), in What the Bleep Do We Know? We do, at subatomic scale, behave quantum mechanically. Then we segue to a narrative starring Amanda (Marlee Maitlin), a wedding photographer who's bummed because her slimy husband cheated on her. Hobbs also discusses Hagelin's experiment with Transcendental Meditation and the Washington DC rate of violent crime, saying that "the number of murders actually went up". What the Bleep Do We Know was directed and produced by Betsy Chasse, Mark Vicente and William Arntz, all of whom were students of Ramthas School of Enlightenment. Bleep was conceived and its production funded by William Arntz, who co-directed the film along with Betsy Chasse and Mark Vicente; all three were students of Ramtha's School of Enlightenment. That would be, very hard to quantify:). The figures are a bit rubbery, but the idea that we're only 'aware' of a fraction of our brain's activity is both correct and a huge relief. 3. Wow, indeed! document.getElementById( "ak_js_1" ).setAttribute( "value", ( new Date() ).getTime() ); document.getElementById( "ak_js_2" ).setAttribute( "value", ( new Date() ).getTime() ); WatchDocumentaries.com | Games | Quizzes | Contact |Privacy & Terms | Manage Cookies |Advertise | DMCA, Aleister Crowley: The Wickedest Man in the World. It was amusing when John Hagelin tried to run for US president representing the Natural Law party during the 1990s. Often, people who are trying to sell whatever it is they're trying to sell try to justify it on the basis of science. This will be revisited if anyone else tries to circumvent a channel ban in future.PLEASE READ CAREFULLY:I'm citing \"Fair Use\" under US Copyright Act, Title 17 512 (g)(f), specifically those clauses covering Comment and Criticism, as well as the DMCA.http://www.aclunc.org/issues/technology/blog/asset_upload_file939_6218.pdfAlso \"Fair Dealing\" under UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 c.48, Part 1(Copyright) Section 79.4ahttp://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts1988/ukpga_19880048_en_4Censorship is NOT a valid argument.This is the first part of my critical analysis of \"What The Bleep Do We Know?! is god-awful. you are agreeing to our, One month free trial to theMonitorDaily, Staff writer of The Christian Science Monitor, Performance of quantum computer no better than ordinary PC, say analysts, 'Spooky' physics: How quantum entanglement could link wormholes, Quantum 'teleportation' distance record broken. Quantum physics doesn't need them to. continue to use the site without a And quantum mechanics is often used as the explanation for that. The point is, with quantum mechanics, everything doesn't go. Amit Goswami (PhD) in What the Bleep Do We Know?. Our work isn't possible without your support. Where were we now? We're not using either superconductivity or superfluidity yet on the scale that I think people thought we might. We all know most parts of the ocean are still undiscovered but there's plenty of theories. A: Of course it does. As he told ABC's "This Week" the day after the debate: "When it . [12][13] Lisa Randall refers to the film as "the bane of scientists". based on this subject nature contained, I hold these 2 films in a very high regard. extended versions of What the BLEEP Do We Know! If we don't understand classical consciousness, how can we understand quantum consciousness? A scientist debunks the claim that water reacts to human emotions. We believe news can and should expand a sense of identity and possibility beyond narrow conventional expectations. The only problem with Andrew Newberg's statement is that it suggests our subconscious brains are doing really interesting stuff and we're somehow missing out; if only we could harness that other zillion gigabits or so we'd be masters of our destinies. One of the scientists who was in the film and had never appeared at the school is Dr David Albert Professor and Director of Philosophical Physics at Columbia university. Everyone is still talking about the movie What the Bleep Do We Know!? Check my single page unpublishable http://dftuz.unizar.es/~rivero/research/simple.pdf. Daniel Monti, physician and director of the Mind-Body Medicine Program at. Some movies are so bad, they're funny. So what constitutes quantum quackery? Present thinking on neurology and addiction are covered in some detail but,. By clicking 'Send to a friend' you agree ABC Online is not responsible for the content contained in your email message. : Directed by William Arntz, Betsy Chasse, Mark Vicente. Im not personally familiar with any of Hagelins work but Im sure theres some good physics in there. A moderately low-budget independent film, it was promoted using viral marketing methods and opened in art-house theaters in the western United States, winning several independent film awards before being picked up by a major distributor and eventually grossing over $10 million. The sub-atomic particles that make up the atoms that make up the rock are there too. Quantum physics tells us that reality isn't fixed subatomic particles only come into existence when they are observed, 2. In the last of a series of columns written for Scientific American, Krauss says "no area of physics stimulates more nonsense in the public arena than quantum mechanics." His 73 papers are mostly about supersymmetric GUTs and considered quite respectable, with a total of over 5000 citations, including 641 citations for one of them alone. He points out that Gallo et al anounced that AIDS is caused by HIV at a press conference, without there being a single paper published in a scientific journal substantiating this. The director, William Arntz, has described What the Bleep as a film for the "metaphysical left". Interspersed with the plot were interviews with various supposed scientists with something to say about quantum physics, consciousness, God, etc. ?Discovering the Endless Possibilities of Your Everyday Reality. Nasa found something. ", "The movie is saying that somehow we can all get together and, with our collective thought processes, we can influence the outcome" of physical events - be they life experiences or scientific experiments, notes Bruce Schumm, a particle physicist at the University of California at Santa Cruz. The Effect of Meditation on Violent Crime in Washington, DC. In addition, the film mentioned clipper ships which were not even in existence at that time. "Particles appear and disappear where do they go when they're not here? Around 650 million people watched the moment on television. And I came out of wanting to meditate more often, which can't be a bad thing. But quantum mechanics, for better or worse, doesn't bring any more spiritual benefits than gravity does. Hagelin was a grad student at Harvard when I was an undergrad and I met him when we were in the same quantum field theory class. According to an article in Fortean Times by David Hambling, the origins of this story likely involved the voyages of Captain James Cook, not Columbus, and an account related by Robert Hughes which said Cook's ships were "complex and unfamiliar as to defy the natives' understanding". A moment in which 'the mathematical formalisms of quantum mechanics [] are stripped of all empirical content and reduced to a set of syrupy nostrums'. 5.Miceal Ledwith a clergyman with a rather dubious past (see http://unison.ie/irish_independent/stories.php3?ca=36&si=770458&issue_id=7565) is the one chosen by the film makers to be the theological spokesman. and of course the big guy himself, Ramtha. Unfortunately, it also completely misunderstands it. "Our brain receives 400 billion bits/second of information, but we're only aware of 2000 bits/second. And any Cognitive Behavioural Therapist can help us to change the way we see things by changing our thought patterns. The article states that the domestic gross exceeded $10 million, described as not bad for a low-budget documentary, and that the DVD release attained even more significant success with over a million units shipped in the first six months following its release in March 2005. A disproportionate amount of time was given in voice and film to Ramtha, Dr. Joe dispenza, and Miceal Ledwith. On this Wikipedia the language links are at the top of the page across from the article title. Fred Alan Wolf, PhD in What the Bleep Do We Know? Though not marketed as such, those who have seen it note that it degenerates into an extended infomercial for channeler J. I started out thinking that BLEEP 2 would be a ground-breaking update covering ideas and discoveries in quantum physics, brain neurology and consciousness studies introduced over a decade ago. Categories conflate, confound, connect", "Our power is in our ability to decide - Can you? Q: Why do you think that people have seized upon this? It's used as an excuse to be even weirder. Hobbs further disputed the film's use of the ten percent of the brain myth. You can't bring good things to you by thinking about them. A: Absolutely. In the documentary segments of the film, interviewees discuss the roots and meaning of Amanda's experiences. The question "What the bleep do we know?" has an unambiguous answer: both surprisingly much and amazingly little. Dr Joe Dispenza (the one who creates his day) has gone to court and testified that his teacher (ramtha) has told him that terrible times are coming and that he needs to protect his family. There are also phrases plagiarized entire from "The Matrix," a far superior film treatment of the notion that reality isn't what it seems. [4] The visual-effects team, led by Evan Jacobs, worked closely with the other film-makers to create visual metaphors that would capture the essence of the film's technical subjects with attention to aesthetic detail. During our current Covid19 pandemic, this collection is highly relevant to a world still seeking novel answers to the human condition and also drawn to old theories long ago debunked. That movie started its life as a small documentary about Spirit and Science, but grew in scope (and budget) and became What the BLEEP Do We Know!? ?, never before seen DVD programming features, 20 minutes of new animation, new interviews, along with 5 hours of uncut interviews and a filmmakers Q&A, the Quantum Edition contains over 15 hours of material on 6 DVD sides. It was an interesting idea aiming to solve the hierachy problem, as announced. While Amanda waits for a commuter train, she (and we) are shown the work of Japanese scientist Masaru Emoto, who has photographed water after exposing it to different emotions. [1], In mid-2005, the filmmakers worked with HCI Books to expand on the film's themes in a book titled What the Bleep Do We Know! Particles Popping Into & Out of Existence. "What the Bleep Do We Know," as it is referred to for convenience, is not a conventional documentary about quantum physics. Publishers Weekly What the Bleep Do We Know!? Dr Joao Migueijo is reader in theoretical physics at Imperial College, London.What the Bleep Do We Know!? For starters you'd have to take a lot of samples from different parts of each ice specimen. Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. The brain wasn't born yesterday. Interspersed with Amanda's woes and the pseudoscience are random attacks on organized religion. Evidently Albert claims he was taken advantage of, that his interview was heavily edited to misrepresent his views. You are free to comment as you wish. You see my physics students don't understand it. That is because I don't understand it. When you hear the term "quantum consciousness," you should be suspicious. what the bleep do we know watch online free, what the bleep do we know trailer, what the bleep do we know movie, what the bleep do we know debunked, what the bleep do .